For too long now, in the transition from year to year we forced to make the profession of "pessimism of reason" and "optimism of the will." It happens even today. We leave behind the first decade of the third millennium, some recent statistics that has had the courage and zeal to judge the "best years of human history" for the technological achievements, scientific and medical applications. A hasty judgments and, in many respects, misleading. The statistics can also enhance the 'fates Magnificent and progressive "new technologies, but the perception that we all feel inside is that the world is made worse than it was ten years ago. And so our country. It would be a long list of things that are missing or materials that have not been implemented over the past ten years. But the index of deterioration is most likely given by a widespread perception, a sense that we could define the collective intellectual, and yet more indicative of wealth or poverty of the materials.
The difference lies in the fact that ten years ago, we all - individuals and peoples, nations and continents - less afraid of the future. We entered the new millennium with courage and desire to face new challenges, but today we look at what awaits us with much more confidence and less anxiety, despite the great technological achievements, scientific and medical applications. It is not just a matter of GDP or unemployment rates, public debt or bank collapse, the recognition of gains and losses. The technicalities of national economic policies and international fora can plug the loopholes, reduce damage, prevent the crash at the moment, but it is now quite clear that the crisis of loss and other responses require other treatments, different solutions and more structural than cyclical shocks.
If you do not think about how we can and must live on this planet if we fail with drastic measures to balance the relationship between resources (not endless) and consumption, unless we are able to slow down, to reverse the mad rush toward a infinite and unlimited growth, in short, if we change the model of development, lifestyles, values \u200b\u200band hegemonic cultural models today, the fear of the future will increase. And there will be economic policy that takes.
seemed that the great global crisis of recent years had opened my eyes not only to governments and economists, but also the common man for a deep rethinking of the way we live and the way of being on the planet, by restoring a proper balance between economic laws and the laws of nature. A cooling-off made it increasingly necessary to compensate for future generations, to leave them a world where a new life, as did previous generations with us. But that initial intuition has been lost on the road. We continue to steal, day after day and year after year, massive doses of future for our heirs, we heavily mortgaged their propettive and lowered to zero, choosing to live their horizons beyond
our chances and above the possibilities offered by the environment.
Even today, in the (vain) attempts to overcome the "technicality" the great economic crisis, we continue to show - as the adult generations - the most selfish and self-centered side, to the disadvantage of those who will happen to us. And without modesty, we show well indignant when our heirs, who have finally figured out what the future in store for them, we have the account - in London and in Rome, Paris or Athens - with all the rage have accumulated.
In this global scenario is not just exciting, Italy is more and more sucked into the spiral of decline, partially braided one that holds the entire West, in part fueled by his delays historical and government deficits that have always characterized . For too long we have remained mired in the fracture-Berlusconi antiberlusconismo without any serious real reform - beyond the propaganda - has pushed the country to modernize. The bankruptcy of the center-right government budget and the center-left governments in countries normal push to change quickly and decisively page, reform (not necessarily to abandon) a bipolar so far has failed its mission.
prevail, however, the tactics, transformers, politicism even among those who have professed over the years - producing, indeed, many failures and causing much trouble to Italian democracy - anti-politics.
last year, as in previous scandals in the building, breaking the former fratricidal majority votes of confidence in the photofinishing market and shameful of parliamentarians, all we talked about except that the real problems of the country. And everything suggests that the scenario in the coming months will not change. The only political force that continues to collect more substantial dividends of the government and the league is no coincidence that the only party not to fear, indeed to invoke the early elections to strengthen further. This year has brought it home, to the detriment of the South, milk quotas, the vast majority of funds for public works and infrastructure in Cipe regions and cities of the North, the transition to a more punitive fiscal federalism that solidarity death blow to most of the municipalities in the South
difficult, therefore, with reason to be optimistic. We can and must be, however, with the will, without giving in to fate but chasing so obstinate what they need most at this moment our country. First, two major national agreements: a North-South pact, leading to the reunification of Italy and a true generational pact, between adults and young people, guaranteeing a future for those who come after us. Patti costing sacrifices and for all, especially for those who have already had and has mortgaged the future of young generations, especially southern ones. It will not be easy to determine where to start, but we know how to begin. There helped in recent days the President of the Republic, once sighted in indicating the road. He summoned to Quirinale a delegation of students and researchers struggle to hear their reasons, thereby sending a clear message to the country: the future must be decided together with them, not against them. It should be decided together everywhere in the family as the main policy. And with the optimism of the will. Greetings.
The difference lies in the fact that ten years ago, we all - individuals and peoples, nations and continents - less afraid of the future. We entered the new millennium with courage and desire to face new challenges, but today we look at what awaits us with much more confidence and less anxiety, despite the great technological achievements, scientific and medical applications. It is not just a matter of GDP or unemployment rates, public debt or bank collapse, the recognition of gains and losses. The technicalities of national economic policies and international fora can plug the loopholes, reduce damage, prevent the crash at the moment, but it is now quite clear that the crisis of loss and other responses require other treatments, different solutions and more structural than cyclical shocks.
If you do not think about how we can and must live on this planet if we fail with drastic measures to balance the relationship between resources (not endless) and consumption, unless we are able to slow down, to reverse the mad rush toward a infinite and unlimited growth, in short, if we change the model of development, lifestyles, values \u200b\u200band hegemonic cultural models today, the fear of the future will increase. And there will be economic policy that takes.
seemed that the great global crisis of recent years had opened my eyes not only to governments and economists, but also the common man for a deep rethinking of the way we live and the way of being on the planet, by restoring a proper balance between economic laws and the laws of nature. A cooling-off made it increasingly necessary to compensate for future generations, to leave them a world where a new life, as did previous generations with us. But that initial intuition has been lost on the road. We continue to steal, day after day and year after year, massive doses of future for our heirs, we heavily mortgaged their propettive and lowered to zero, choosing to live their horizons beyond
our chances and above the possibilities offered by the environment.
Even today, in the (vain) attempts to overcome the "technicality" the great economic crisis, we continue to show - as the adult generations - the most selfish and self-centered side, to the disadvantage of those who will happen to us. And without modesty, we show well indignant when our heirs, who have finally figured out what the future in store for them, we have the account - in London and in Rome, Paris or Athens - with all the rage have accumulated.
In this global scenario is not just exciting, Italy is more and more sucked into the spiral of decline, partially braided one that holds the entire West, in part fueled by his delays historical and government deficits that have always characterized . For too long we have remained mired in the fracture-Berlusconi antiberlusconismo without any serious real reform - beyond the propaganda - has pushed the country to modernize. The bankruptcy of the center-right government budget and the center-left governments in countries normal push to change quickly and decisively page, reform (not necessarily to abandon) a bipolar so far has failed its mission.
prevail, however, the tactics, transformers, politicism even among those who have professed over the years - producing, indeed, many failures and causing much trouble to Italian democracy - anti-politics.
last year, as in previous scandals in the building, breaking the former fratricidal majority votes of confidence in the photofinishing market and shameful of parliamentarians, all we talked about except that the real problems of the country. And everything suggests that the scenario in the coming months will not change. The only political force that continues to collect more substantial dividends of the government and the league is no coincidence that the only party not to fear, indeed to invoke the early elections to strengthen further. This year has brought it home, to the detriment of the South, milk quotas, the vast majority of funds for public works and infrastructure in Cipe regions and cities of the North, the transition to a more punitive fiscal federalism that solidarity death blow to most of the municipalities in the South
difficult, therefore, with reason to be optimistic. We can and must be, however, with the will, without giving in to fate but chasing so obstinate what they need most at this moment our country. First, two major national agreements: a North-South pact, leading to the reunification of Italy and a true generational pact, between adults and young people, guaranteeing a future for those who come after us. Patti costing sacrifices and for all, especially for those who have already had and has mortgaged the future of young generations, especially southern ones. It will not be easy to determine where to start, but we know how to begin. There helped in recent days the President of the Republic, once sighted in indicating the road. He summoned to Quirinale a delegation of students and researchers struggle to hear their reasons, thereby sending a clear message to the country: the future must be decided together with them, not against them. It should be decided together everywhere in the family as the main policy. And with the optimism of the will. Greetings.
Back to successfully Pavidea, that this last race of 2010, defeating the home field of the young athletes Riso Scotti Pavia, with a net score of 3-0. 
The National Coni awarded each year as the stars of merit to those sports clubs that, with commitment and passion have been able to spread the culture of sports among young people, conveying the values \u200b\u200bof sacrifice, challenge, self-respect and opponent. 
