Candle Lighting Poems
antiberlusconiani wary of zealots, Italy is still mad Cav 
When you begin to pick out, to talk about our present political condition, crucial dates like April 25, July 25 amount equal to 8 September, mixing the grain with the chaff of the tragedy of skirmishes where fortunately the dead and wounded are simulations journalism, comes the confusion happens. And every time we talk about the fate of the Cav, the Dini government today, from 1996 to 2010, this temptation shooting accuracy. This side of Italy to free, beyond the freedom to defend this side of normal political reasons, beyond the claims of popular sovereignty, telecratico coup here, technocratic coup there. For fifteen years, bickering, and facing (remember 2006?) Tuna fishing symbolic, but the bowls are still firm to the bipolarity as we have known so far. Or anti-Cav Cav, we are always here, to turn around a buoy consumed. So, to avoid the risk that the public debate has been reduced to a conflict between opposing hallucinations, visions or between ideology and easily biodegradable disconnected from reality, the first risk is to avoid the superficiality: if it is misguided to say, in short, that all is well in Italy because everything must be fine, it is equally imprudent to make bonfires of sixteen years of the Second Republic and trashed the intentions gone bad. Yet, this is the risk to be incurred that excess of zeal antiberlusconiano, assertive, at times joyful and almost counterfactual, that a little everywhere, seems to have lit fuses and outbreaks of activism, reviving feelings among other opposites and mirror and so are unsustainable according to reason. There are some points that are important and subtle problem that can not be overlooked calm analysis of the test. First, do you still consider the error of the Berlusconi a political or just political, a variant of the leader therefore solvable, soluble in the liquid of options or parliamentary government, whereas the Berlusconi is a social phenomenon of television, football, business, symbolic, rooted in Italian since the eighties. It is the story of Italy optimistic that we can do it inside and outside the perimeter of compliance, the narrative reassuring, individualism but never challenge the stereotypes of Italians good people, the disconnect between the rhetoric of values \u200b\u200band daily behavior and love for the old aunts longanesiane. Its political component is only one side, and perhaps not the main one. The Cav interprets and transforms a type of Italian, a variant of diffuse arcitalianità no hypothetical electoral verdict certainly can cancel within a few months. For this reason, the polls also show that it takes away the choice of field of the tricks of the costume to undermine his popularity in a country where morality is always the prelude of absolution: it's called the liberal tolerance or amoral familism, the result is the same. And the result is that consent, the first social and then political, of Berlusconi and his interpreter is still considerable, irrespective of the government, regardless of the gap between marketing success and its actual achievement, regardless of the PDL and the quality of its ruling class, regardless of the errors and uncertainties that the voracity and Squaderno media has swallowed up and buried. The disputed elections, past and perhaps future events where Cav is a solid performer on the model of the "permanent campaign" are the specific indicators that captures the eternal surprise those who imagine it is not for Italy, but as he would like it to be. The analysis of Berlusconi calls for good sociology, not the theory of catastrophe.
When you begin to pick out, to talk about our present political condition, crucial dates like April 25, July 25 amount equal to 8 September, mixing the grain with the chaff of the tragedy of skirmishes where fortunately the dead and wounded are simulations journalism, comes the confusion happens. And every time we talk about the fate of the Cav, the Dini government today, from 1996 to 2010, this temptation shooting accuracy. This side of Italy to free, beyond the freedom to defend this side of normal political reasons, beyond the claims of popular sovereignty, telecratico coup here, technocratic coup there. For fifteen years, bickering, and facing (remember 2006?) Tuna fishing symbolic, but the bowls are still firm to the bipolarity as we have known so far. Or anti-Cav Cav, we are always here, to turn around a buoy consumed. So, to avoid the risk that the public debate has been reduced to a conflict between opposing hallucinations, visions or between ideology and easily biodegradable disconnected from reality, the first risk is to avoid the superficiality: if it is misguided to say, in short, that all is well in Italy because everything must be fine, it is equally imprudent to make bonfires of sixteen years of the Second Republic and trashed the intentions gone bad. Yet, this is the risk to be incurred that excess of zeal antiberlusconiano, assertive, at times joyful and almost counterfactual, that a little everywhere, seems to have lit fuses and outbreaks of activism, reviving feelings among other opposites and mirror and so are unsustainable according to reason. There are some points that are important and subtle problem that can not be overlooked calm analysis of the test. First, do you still consider the error of the Berlusconi a political or just political, a variant of the leader therefore solvable, soluble in the liquid of options or parliamentary government, whereas the Berlusconi is a social phenomenon of television, football, business, symbolic, rooted in Italian since the eighties. It is the story of Italy optimistic that we can do it inside and outside the perimeter of compliance, the narrative reassuring, individualism but never challenge the stereotypes of Italians good people, the disconnect between the rhetoric of values \u200b\u200band daily behavior and love for the old aunts longanesiane. Its political component is only one side, and perhaps not the main one. The Cav interprets and transforms a type of Italian, a variant of diffuse arcitalianità no hypothetical electoral verdict certainly can cancel within a few months. For this reason, the polls also show that it takes away the choice of field of the tricks of the costume to undermine his popularity in a country where morality is always the prelude of absolution: it's called the liberal tolerance or amoral familism, the result is the same. And the result is that consent, the first social and then political, of Berlusconi and his interpreter is still considerable, irrespective of the government, regardless of the gap between marketing success and its actual achievement, regardless of the PDL and the quality of its ruling class, regardless of the errors and uncertainties that the voracity and Squaderno media has swallowed up and buried. The disputed elections, past and perhaps future events where Cav is a solid performer on the model of the "permanent campaign" are the specific indicators that captures the eternal surprise those who imagine it is not for Italy, but as he would like it to be. The analysis of Berlusconi calls for good sociology, not the theory of catastrophe. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment